Comparing SG&A Expenses: Catalent, Inc. vs ImmunityBio, Inc. Trends and Insights

Catalent vs ImmunityBio: A Decade of SG&A Expense Trends

__timestampCatalent, Inc.ImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143348000004326000
Thursday, January 1, 2015337300000226206000
Friday, January 1, 201635810000094391000
Sunday, January 1, 201740260000053821000
Monday, January 1, 201846260000035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 201951200000046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 202057790000071318000
Friday, January 1, 2021687000000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 2022844000000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 2023831000000129620000
Monday, January 1, 2024935000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Tale of Two Companies: Catalent, Inc. vs ImmunityBio, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial health of companies is crucial. Catalent, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts when it comes to their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade.

From 2014 to 2023, Catalent's SG&A expenses have shown a robust upward trend, increasing by approximately 180%. This growth reflects the company's strategic investments in expanding its market reach and operational capabilities. In contrast, ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses have been more volatile, peaking in 2015 and then stabilizing at lower levels. This fluctuation could indicate a more cautious approach to scaling operations or a focus on cost efficiency.

As we look to 2024, Catalent's expenses continue to rise, while ImmunityBio's data remains incomplete, leaving room for speculation on its future trajectory.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025