SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: A Decade of Growth and Efficiency

__timestampBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.ImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143021560004326000
Thursday, January 1, 2015402271000226206000
Friday, January 1, 201647659300094391000
Sunday, January 1, 201755433600053821000
Monday, January 1, 201860435300035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 201968092400046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 202073766900071318000
Friday, January 1, 2021759375000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 2022854009000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 2023937300000129620000
Monday, January 1, 20241009025000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. BioMarin, a leader in rare disease therapies, has seen its SG&A expenses grow steadily, peaking at approximately 937 million in 2023, reflecting a 210% increase since 2014. This growth underscores BioMarin's aggressive expansion and investment in market penetration.

Conversely, ImmunityBio, a pioneer in immunotherapy, has maintained a more conservative SG&A trajectory. Starting at a modest 4.3 million in 2014, their expenses rose to about 130 million by 2023, marking a 2900% increase. This sharp rise highlights ImmunityBio's strategic shift towards scaling operations and enhancing its market presence. As these companies evolve, their SG&A efficiency will remain a key indicator of their operational success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025