Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs AECOM

SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters vs AECOM Over a Decade

__timestampAECOMThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014809080009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151139750008810000000
Friday, January 1, 20161150880008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171333090008079000000
Monday, January 1, 20181357870004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191481230004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201885350003999000000
Friday, January 1, 20211550720001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221473090001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 202315357500064000000
Monday, January 1, 2024160105000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Tale of Two Giants: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a crucial indicator of a company's operational efficiency. This chart provides a fascinating comparison between Thomson Reuters Corporation and AECOM from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Thomson Reuters consistently outspent AECOM, with its SG&A expenses peaking in 2014 at approximately $9.2 billion, a staggering 113 times more than AECOM's $81 million. However, by 2023, Thomson Reuters' expenses plummeted to just $64 million, marking a dramatic 99% decrease. Meanwhile, AECOM's expenses showed a steady upward trend, increasing by 98% from 2014 to 2023. This shift highlights a significant transformation in Thomson Reuters' cost management strategy, while AECOM's gradual increase suggests a stable growth trajectory. The data for 2024 remains incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025