Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated or Blueprint Medicines Corporation

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: Vertex vs. Blueprint

__timestampBlueprint Medicines CorporationVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20147890000305409000
Thursday, January 1, 201514456000377080000
Friday, January 1, 201619218000432829000
Sunday, January 1, 201727986000496079000
Monday, January 1, 201847928000557616000
Tuesday, January 1, 201996388000658498000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020157743000770456000
Friday, January 1, 2021195293000840100000
Saturday, January 1, 2022237374000944700000
Sunday, January 1, 20232951410001136600000
Monday, January 1, 20243592720001464300000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and Blueprint Medicines Corporation have demonstrated contrasting strategies in this area. From 2014 to 2023, Vertex Pharmaceuticals saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.14 billion in 2023, reflecting a growth of nearly 272% from 2014. In contrast, Blueprint Medicines, while also experiencing an increase, managed a more modest rise of around 3,640% over the same period, reaching $295 million in 2023. This stark difference highlights Vertex's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities, while Blueprint's leaner approach suggests a focus on strategic cost management. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A strategies will remain pivotal in shaping their financial health and competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025