Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs TransUnion

Thomson Reuters vs TransUnion: A Decade of EBITDA Insights

__timestampThomson Reuters CorporationTransUnion
Wednesday, January 1, 20144289000000429400000
Thursday, January 1, 20153151000000478200000
Friday, January 1, 20162999000000585300000
Sunday, January 1, 20171495930891701100000
Monday, January 1, 20181345686008819800000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191913474675993200000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202757000000883400000
Friday, January 1, 202119942964411010500000
Saturday, January 1, 202230100000001173800000
Sunday, January 1, 20232950000000667300000
Monday, January 1, 20241204100000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of financial analytics, Thomson Reuters Corporation and TransUnion stand as titans. Over the past decade, their EBITDA performance has painted a vivid picture of resilience and adaptation. From 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters saw a significant fluctuation, with EBITDA peaking in 2014 and experiencing a notable dip in 2017. Despite this, they managed a robust recovery, achieving a 123% increase by 2022 compared to their 2018 low.

TransUnion, on the other hand, demonstrated steady growth, with EBITDA rising by approximately 173% from 2014 to 2022. However, 2023 marked a downturn, with a 43% decrease from the previous year. This data underscores the dynamic nature of the financial services industry, where strategic pivots and market conditions can dramatically influence outcomes. As these companies navigate future challenges, their financial strategies will be crucial in maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025