Thomson Reuters Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance

EBITDA Trends: Thomson Reuters vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201419754000004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 201517419000003151000000
Friday, January 1, 201618102000002999000000
Sunday, January 1, 201721960000001495930891
Monday, January 1, 201817912000001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 201919206000001913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 202020042000002757000000
Friday, January 1, 202123455000001994296441
Saturday, January 1, 20229428000003010000000
Sunday, January 1, 20238027000002950000000
Monday, January 1, 2024286300000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Comparative Analysis of EBITDA Trends: Thomson Reuters vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the financial health of industry giants is crucial. This analysis delves into the EBITDA performance of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this decade, Thomson Reuters consistently outperformed Stanley Black & Decker, with an average EBITDA approximately 48% higher. Notably, 2014 marked a peak for Thomson Reuters, boasting an EBITDA nearly three times that of Stanley Black & Decker. However, by 2023, both companies faced challenges, with Stanley Black & Decker's EBITDA dropping by 59% from its 2017 high, while Thomson Reuters saw a 31% decline from its 2014 peak. This data underscores the dynamic nature of corporate performance and the importance of strategic adaptability in maintaining financial robustness.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025