__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | HP Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5229000000 | 84839000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5707000000 | 41524000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6314000000 | 39240000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 8005000000 | 42478000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9436000000 | 47803000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8222000000 | 47586000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9510000000 | 46202000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12149000000 | 50070000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13792000000 | 50648000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14133000000 | 42210000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14279000000 | 41741000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Applied Materials, Inc. and HP Inc., two titans in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials has seen a steady increase in its cost of revenue, growing by approximately 173%, from $5.2 billion to $14.3 billion. This reflects their strategic investments in innovation and production efficiency.
Conversely, HP Inc. has experienced a more volatile journey. Starting at a peak of $84.8 billion in 2014, their cost of revenue has decreased by about 51% to $41.7 billion in 2024. This reduction highlights HP's focus on streamlining operations and adapting to market demands.
These trends underscore the dynamic nature of cost management strategies in the tech industry, where efficiency can be a key differentiator in maintaining competitive advantage.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Garmin Ltd.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs HP Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Applied Materials, Inc. and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's Expenses
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs HubSpot, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Wipro Limited
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and HP Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Electronic Arts Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and II-VI Incorporated
Research and Development Investment: Applied Materials, Inc. vs HP Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or HP Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. and HP Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance