Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs HP Inc.

Tech Giants' Cost Efficiency: A Decade of Change

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.HP Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014522900000084839000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015570700000041524000000
Friday, January 1, 2016631400000039240000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017800500000042478000000
Monday, January 1, 2018943600000047803000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019822200000047586000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020951000000046202000000
Friday, January 1, 20211214900000050070000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221379200000050648000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231413300000042210000000
Monday, January 1, 20241427900000041741000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Applied Materials, Inc. and HP Inc., two titans in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials has seen a steady increase in its cost of revenue, growing by approximately 173%, from $5.2 billion to $14.3 billion. This reflects their strategic investments in innovation and production efficiency.

Conversely, HP Inc. has experienced a more volatile journey. Starting at a peak of $84.8 billion in 2014, their cost of revenue has decreased by about 51% to $41.7 billion in 2024. This reduction highlights HP's focus on streamlining operations and adapting to market demands.

These trends underscore the dynamic nature of cost management strategies in the tech industry, where efficiency can be a key differentiator in maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025