| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | HP Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 13353000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 4720000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 3840000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 4376000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 4866000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 5368000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 4906000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 5741000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 5264000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 5356000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 5658000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and HP Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials has consistently optimized its SG&A costs, with a notable 100% increase from 2014 to 2024. In contrast, HP Inc. has seen fluctuations, with a peak in 2014 and a subsequent 58% reduction by 2016, before stabilizing around 5.3 billion USD in recent years.
Applied Materials' steady rise in SG&A expenses reflects strategic investments in growth, while HP's initial high costs followed by stabilization suggest a focus on efficiency. This comparison highlights the diverse approaches companies can take in managing operational costs, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs HP Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs HP Inc.
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and HP Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. or Wipro Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fair Isaac Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and HubSpot, Inc.
Research and Development Investment: Applied Materials, Inc. vs HP Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Garmin Ltd. Trends and Insights
Applied Materials, Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Applied Materials, Inc. and HP Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and Electronic Arts Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.