Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Cost Efficiency: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. ADMA Biologics

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Wednesday, January 1, 201437423673932000000
Thursday, January 1, 201543114613909000000
Friday, January 1, 201663607614946000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017291643216066000000
Monday, January 1, 2018421946356547000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019395042388078000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206129142611773000000
Friday, January 1, 2021797693419940000000
Saturday, January 1, 202211881453510137000000
Sunday, January 1, 202316927300010693000000
Monday, January 1, 202411949000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, cost efficiency is paramount. This analysis compares the cost of revenue efficiency between Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and ADMA Biologics, Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2023. Bristol-Myers Squibb, a giant in the industry, consistently reported a cost of revenue averaging around $7.6 billion annually. In contrast, ADMA Biologics, a smaller player, averaged approximately $55 million. Despite the vast difference in scale, ADMA Biologics demonstrated a remarkable growth trajectory, with its cost of revenue increasing by over 4,400% from 2014 to 2023. Meanwhile, Bristol-Myers Squibb's cost of revenue grew by about 172% during the same period. This stark contrast highlights the dynamic nature of the industry, where smaller companies can rapidly scale their operations, albeit with different financial implications compared to their larger counterparts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025