Cost of Revenue Comparison: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.

Pharma Giants: Cost of Revenue Trends from 2014 to 2023

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyIntra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014393200000021226345
Thursday, January 1, 20153909000000139626
Friday, January 1, 2016494600000093831530
Sunday, January 1, 2017606600000079419009
Monday, January 1, 20186547000000368673
Tuesday, January 1, 20198078000000477121
Wednesday, January 1, 2020117730000001895029
Friday, January 1, 202199400000008034589
Saturday, January 1, 20221013700000020443000
Sunday, January 1, 20231069300000033745000
Monday, January 1, 202411949000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, understanding cost structures is crucial. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a titan in the industry, has consistently demonstrated robust cost management. From 2014 to 2023, their cost of revenue surged by approximately 172%, peaking in 2020. This reflects their strategic investments and operational efficiencies.

A Closer Look at Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.

In contrast, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc., a burgeoning player, has shown a more volatile trajectory. Their cost of revenue increased by over 1,500% during the same period, highlighting their aggressive growth strategy. Despite the disparity in scale, both companies underscore the dynamic nature of pharmaceutical economics.

Key Insights

While Bristol-Myers Squibb's cost of revenue is significantly higher, Intra-Cellular's rapid growth rate is noteworthy. This comparison offers a glimpse into the diverse strategies within the pharmaceutical sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025