Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Fastenal Company vs Pentair plc

Fastenal vs Pentair: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampFastenal CompanyPentair plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201418361050004563000000
Thursday, January 1, 201519202530004263200000
Friday, January 1, 201619972590003095900000
Sunday, January 1, 201722269000003107400000
Monday, January 1, 201825662000001917400000
Tuesday, January 1, 201928183000001905700000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030795000001960200000
Friday, January 1, 202132337000002445600000
Saturday, January 1, 202237648000002757200000
Sunday, January 1, 202339922000002585300000
Monday, January 1, 202441441000002484000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of industrial and consumer products, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Fastenal Company and Pentair plc, two giants in their respective fields, have shown distinct trends in their cost of revenue from 2014 to 2023. Fastenal has demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory, with a notable 126% increase in cost efficiency over the decade. In contrast, Pentair's cost of revenue peaked in 2014 and has since seen a 43% decline, reflecting strategic shifts and market challenges.

Fastenal's steady growth, culminating in a 2023 cost of revenue of approximately $4.1 billion, underscores its robust operational strategies. Meanwhile, Pentair's fluctuating figures, with a 2023 cost of revenue of around $2.6 billion, highlight its adaptive strategies in a dynamic market. This comparison not only sheds light on their financial health but also offers insights into their strategic priorities over the years.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025