Cost of Revenue Trends: Fastenal Company vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Comparative cost analysis of Fastenal and Booz Allen Hamilton.

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationFastenal Company
Wednesday, January 1, 201427161130001836105000
Thursday, January 1, 201525938490001920253000
Friday, January 1, 201625800260001997259000
Sunday, January 1, 201726919820002226900000
Monday, January 1, 201828671030002566200000
Tuesday, January 1, 201931004660002818300000
Wednesday, January 1, 202033791800003079500000
Friday, January 1, 202136575300003233700000
Saturday, January 1, 202238996220003764800000
Sunday, January 1, 202343048100003992200000
Monday, January 1, 202482028470004144100000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue Trends: A Comparative Analysis

Fastenal Company vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding cost structures is pivotal. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Fastenal Company and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation from 2014 to 2024. Over this decade, Booz Allen Hamilton's cost of revenue surged by approximately 202%, peaking at $8.2 billion in 2024. In contrast, Fastenal Company experienced a more modest increase of around 126%, reaching $4.1 billion in the same year.

The data reveals a consistent upward trajectory for both companies, with Booz Allen Hamilton's costs consistently outpacing Fastenal's. Notably, the year 2024 marks a significant leap for Booz Allen Hamilton, doubling its cost of revenue from the previous year. This trend underscores the dynamic nature of operational expenses in different sectors, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025