Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Ferguson plc vs Lennox International Inc.

Ferguson vs. Lennox: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampFerguson plcLennox International Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014159957394282464100000
Thursday, January 1, 2015149842418942520000000
Friday, January 1, 2016136771448582565100000
Sunday, January 1, 2017142158666732714400000
Monday, January 1, 2018147080000002772700000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019155520000002727400000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020153980000002594000000
Friday, January 1, 2021158120000003005700000
Saturday, January 1, 2022198100000003433700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023207090000003434100000
Monday, January 1, 2024205820000003569400000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of industrial manufacturing, Ferguson plc and Lennox International Inc. stand as titans, each with a unique approach to cost management. Over the past decade, Ferguson plc has consistently demonstrated superior cost efficiency, with its cost of revenue averaging around 16.5 billion annually. In contrast, Lennox International Inc. has maintained a more modest average of approximately 2.9 billion, highlighting a significant disparity in scale and operational strategy.

A Decade of Trends

From 2014 to 2024, Ferguson plc's cost of revenue grew by nearly 29%, peaking in 2023. Meanwhile, Lennox International Inc. saw a 45% increase, reflecting its strategic investments and market expansion. This data underscores the dynamic nature of cost management in the industrial sector, where efficiency and growth are paramount.

Key Insights

Ferguson plc's larger scale allows for economies of scale, while Lennox International Inc.'s growth trajectory suggests a focus on strategic expansion. These insights provide a window into the operational strategies of two industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025