Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Ferrovial SE vs Global Payments Inc.

Cost Efficiency Showdown: Ferrovial SE vs. Global Payments Inc.

__timestampFerrovial SEGlobal Payments Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411310000001022107000
Thursday, January 1, 201511430000001147639000
Friday, January 1, 201612670000001603532000
Sunday, January 1, 201713450000001928037000
Monday, January 1, 20189850000001095014000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199490000002073803000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010050000003650727000
Friday, January 1, 202110770000003773725000
Saturday, January 1, 202211970000003778617000
Sunday, January 1, 202311290000003727521000
Monday, January 1, 20243760116000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Tale of Two Giants: Ferrovial SE vs. Global Payments Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This chart offers a fascinating glimpse into the cost of revenue efficiency of two industry titans: Ferrovial SE and Global Payments Inc., from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Global Payments Inc. has consistently outpaced Ferrovial SE, with its cost of revenue peaking at nearly 3.8 billion in 2022, a staggering 230% increase from 2014. In contrast, Ferrovial SE's cost of revenue has remained relatively stable, with a modest 6% increase over the same period. This disparity highlights Global Payments Inc.'s aggressive growth strategy, while Ferrovial SE maintains a more conservative approach. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, understanding these dynamics is crucial for investors and stakeholders alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025