__timestamp | Ferrovial SE | Global Payments Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1131000000 | 1022107000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1143000000 | 1147639000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1267000000 | 1603532000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1345000000 | 1928037000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 985000000 | 1095014000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 949000000 | 2073803000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1005000000 | 3650727000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1077000000 | 3773725000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1197000000 | 3778617000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1129000000 | 3727521000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3760116000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This chart offers a fascinating glimpse into the cost of revenue efficiency of two industry titans: Ferrovial SE and Global Payments Inc., from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Global Payments Inc. has consistently outpaced Ferrovial SE, with its cost of revenue peaking at nearly 3.8 billion in 2022, a staggering 230% increase from 2014. In contrast, Ferrovial SE's cost of revenue has remained relatively stable, with a modest 6% increase over the same period. This disparity highlights Global Payments Inc.'s aggressive growth strategy, while Ferrovial SE maintains a more conservative approach. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, understanding these dynamics is crucial for investors and stakeholders alike.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Ferrovial SE vs Dover Corporation
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Ryanair Holdings plc
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Ferrovial SE and Lennox International Inc.
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Ferrovial SE vs Global Payments Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Ferrovial SE vs EMCOR Group, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Ferrovial SE and Hubbell Incorporated
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Builders FirstSource, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Ferrovial SE vs Watsco, Inc.