__timestamp | Ferrovial SE | Watsco, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1131000000 | 2988138000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1143000000 | 3105882000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1267000000 | 3186118000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1345000000 | 3276296000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 985000000 | 3426401000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 949000000 | 3613406000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1005000000 | 3832107000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1077000000 | 4612647000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1197000000 | 5244055000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1129000000 | 5291627000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 5573604000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding cost efficiency is paramount. Ferrovial SE and Watsco, Inc., two industry titans, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Ferrovial SE's cost of revenue fluctuated modestly, peaking in 2017 and dipping in 2018, reflecting a strategic recalibration. Meanwhile, Watsco, Inc. demonstrated a robust upward trajectory, with costs surging by nearly 77% over the same period. This stark difference highlights Watsco's aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies.
This comparative analysis underscores the diverse strategies employed by global leaders in navigating the complexities of cost management.
Who Generates More Revenue? Ferrovial SE or Watsco, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Ferrovial SE vs Dover Corporation
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Ryanair Holdings plc
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Ferrovial SE and Lennox International Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Ferrovial SE vs EMCOR Group, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Ferrovial SE and Hubbell Incorporated
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Builders FirstSource, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Ferrovial SE and Southwest Airlines Co.
Ferrovial SE vs AerCap Holdings N.V.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Ferrovial SE vs Watsco, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown