Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Microchip Technology Incorporated

Marvell vs. Microchip: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampMarvell Technology, Inc.Microchip Technology Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20141654230000802474000
Thursday, January 1, 20151843706000917472000
Friday, January 1, 20161494736000967870000
Sunday, January 1, 201710295270001650611000
Monday, January 1, 20189472300001560100000
Tuesday, January 1, 201914073990002418200000
Wednesday, January 1, 202013422200002032100000
Friday, January 1, 202114805500002059600000
Saturday, January 1, 202223981580002371300000
Sunday, January 1, 202329321000002740800000
Monday, January 1, 202432141000002638700000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: Marvell vs. Microchip

In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Marvell Technology, Inc. and Microchip Technology Incorporated have demonstrated contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2024, Marvell's cost of revenue surged by approximately 94%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment strategies. In contrast, Microchip's cost of revenue increased by about 229% during the same period, indicating a more conservative growth approach.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2018: Marvell maintained a relatively stable cost structure, while Microchip's costs nearly doubled, suggesting different operational strategies.
  • 2019-2023: Both companies saw significant increases, with Marvell's costs peaking in 2023, highlighting its rapid scaling efforts.
  • 2024 Outlook: Marvell's costs are projected to rise further, while Microchip shows signs of cost stabilization.

These trends underscore the dynamic nature of the semiconductor sector, where strategic cost management can be a decisive factor in competitive positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025