| __timestamp | Marvell Technology, Inc. | VeriSign, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1654230000 | 188425000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1843706000 | 192788000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1494736000 | 198242000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1029527000 | 193326000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 947230000 | 192134000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1407399000 | 180467000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1342220000 | 180177000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1480550000 | 191933000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2398158000 | 200700000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2932100000 | 197300000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3214100000 | 191400000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving tech landscape, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Marvell Technology, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Marvell's cost of revenue surged by approximately 94%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and expansion in the semiconductor industry. In contrast, VeriSign maintained a steady cost of revenue, with only a 5% increase, highlighting its stable operations in domain name registry services.
Marvell's peak in 2023, with a cost of revenue reaching over 3.2 billion, underscores its significant investment in innovation and market expansion. Meanwhile, VeriSign's consistent figures, peaking at around 200 million, emphasize its focus on operational efficiency. This comparison not only highlights the diverse strategies of these tech giants but also offers insights into their market positioning and future potential.
Marvell Technology, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Marvell Technology, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc's Expenses
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Zebra Technologies Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Marvell Technology, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.'s Expenses
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Marvell Technology, Inc. and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.'s Expenses
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Marvell Technology, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
Marvell Technology, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends