__timestamp | Marvell Technology, Inc. | Seagate Technology Holdings plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1654230000 | 9878000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1843706000 | 9930000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1494736000 | 8545000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1029527000 | 7597000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 947230000 | 7820000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1407399000 | 7458000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1342220000 | 7667000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1480550000 | 7764000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2398158000 | 8192000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2932100000 | 6033000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3214100000 | 5005000000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding cost structures is crucial for investors and analysts alike. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Marvell Technology, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc from 2014 to 2024. Over this decade, Marvell's cost of revenue has surged by approximately 94%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and increased production capabilities. In contrast, Seagate's expenses have decreased by nearly 49%, indicating a strategic shift towards efficiency and cost management.
The year 2023 marked a pivotal point, with Marvell's costs peaking at 3.2 billion, while Seagate's dropped to 5 billion. This divergence highlights the distinct paths these companies are taking in the competitive tech landscape. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into each company's operational priorities and market positioning.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs PTC Inc.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Zebra Technologies Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Marvell Technology, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.'s Expenses
Gross Profit Comparison: Marvell Technology, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc Trends
Research and Development: Comparing Key Metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Marvell Technology, Inc. or Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?