__timestamp | Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | Marvell Technology, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 176541000 | 1654230000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 189057000 | 1843706000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 202003000 | 1494736000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 212963000 | 1029527000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 201379000 | 947230000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 215400000 | 1407399000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 226500000 | 1342220000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 258100000 | 1480550000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 304400000 | 2398158000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 282600000 | 2932100000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3214100000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, Marvell Technology, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. have carved distinct paths. From 2014 to 2023, Marvell's cost of revenue surged by approximately 77%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation strategies. In contrast, Check Point's cost of revenue grew by about 60%, showcasing its steady and consistent approach to maintaining market presence.
Marvell's cost of revenue peaked in 2023, reaching nearly $2.93 billion, a testament to its robust growth trajectory. Meanwhile, Check Point's cost of revenue saw a significant rise in 2022, hitting $304 million, before slightly declining in 2023. This divergence highlights the contrasting business models and market strategies of these two tech titans.
While Marvell's data extends into 2024, Check Point's figures for that year remain elusive, leaving room for speculation on future trends.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs PTC Inc.
Revenue Showdown: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Marvell Technology, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc's Expenses
Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Zebra Technologies Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Marvell Technology, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.'s Expenses
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Research and Development Investment: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.