Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: ServiceNow, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.

ServiceNow vs. Pure Storage: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampPure Storage, Inc.ServiceNow, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201424129000248776000
Thursday, January 1, 201577552000329413000
Friday, January 1, 2016167893000398682000
Sunday, January 1, 2017252279000499772000
Monday, January 1, 2018353781000622658000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019457528000796645000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020509886000987113000
Friday, January 1, 20215352550001353000000
Saturday, January 1, 20227083290001573000000
Sunday, January 1, 20238557880001921000000
Monday, January 1, 20248094300002287000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: ServiceNow vs. Pure Storage

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, ServiceNow, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. have demonstrated distinct trajectories in managing their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, ServiceNow's cost of revenue surged by approximately 670%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and expanding service offerings. In contrast, Pure Storage saw a more modest increase of around 3,450%, indicative of its rapid scaling in the storage solutions market.

Key Insights

  • ServiceNow's Growth: By 2023, ServiceNow's cost of revenue reached nearly $1.9 billion, showcasing its significant market expansion.
  • Pure Storage's Trajectory: Starting from a modest base, Pure Storage's cost of revenue climbed to over $850 million by 2023, highlighting its robust growth.

These trends underscore the dynamic nature of the tech industry, where strategic cost management can be a decisive factor in a company's competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025