SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing ServiceNow, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.

SG&A Strategies: ServiceNow vs. Pure Storage

__timestampPure Storage, Inc.ServiceNow, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201460652000437364000
Thursday, January 1, 2015184674000625043000
Friday, January 1, 2016315976000859400000
Sunday, January 1, 20174446870001157150000
Monday, January 1, 20185752000001499083000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197216170001873300000
Wednesday, January 1, 20208911750002309181000
Friday, January 1, 20218984910002889000000
Saturday, January 1, 20229889820003549000000
Sunday, January 1, 202311216050004164000000
Monday, January 1, 202411972640004790000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Innovators

In the dynamic world of technology, ServiceNow, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. have emerged as leaders, each with a unique approach to managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Over the past decade, ServiceNow has consistently outpaced Pure Storage in SG&A spending, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. From 2014 to 2023, ServiceNow's SG&A expenses surged by nearly 850%, peaking at approximately $4.16 billion in 2023. In contrast, Pure Storage's expenses grew by about 1,870%, reaching around $1.12 billion in the same year.

This divergence highlights ServiceNow's focus on scaling operations and expanding market reach, while Pure Storage emphasizes efficiency and cost management. Notably, 2024 data for ServiceNow is missing, suggesting a potential shift or anomaly in reporting. As these companies continue to innovate, their SG&A strategies will be crucial in shaping their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025