SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech SG&A: Alnylam vs. Protagonist's Growth Strategies

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014445260001860000
Thursday, January 1, 2015606100002963000
Friday, January 1, 2016893540006961000
Sunday, January 1, 201719936500011779000
Monday, January 1, 201838235900013697000
Tuesday, January 1, 201947900500015749000
Wednesday, January 1, 202058842000018638000
Friday, January 1, 202162063900027196000
Saturday, January 1, 202277065800031739000
Sunday, January 1, 202379564600033491000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational costs is crucial for success. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Alnylam's Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses surged by over 1,600%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, Protagonist Therapeutics maintained a more conservative growth, with SG&A expenses increasing by approximately 1,700% during the same period, albeit from a much smaller base.

Alnylam's SG&A expenses peaked in 2023, reaching nearly 800 million, a testament to its robust operational scale. Meanwhile, Protagonist's expenses, though significantly lower, showed a steady upward trend, indicating a strategic focus on sustainable growth. This analysis underscores the diverse approaches biotech companies take in balancing growth and efficiency, offering valuable insights for investors and industry stakeholders alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025