SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Eli Lilly and Company and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Eli Lilly vs. Alnylam's Strategic Approaches

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Eli Lilly and Company
Wednesday, January 1, 2014445260006620800000
Thursday, January 1, 2015606100006533000000
Friday, January 1, 2016893540006452000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171993650006588100000
Monday, January 1, 20183823590005975100000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194790050006213800000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205884200006121200000
Friday, January 1, 20216206390006431600000
Saturday, January 1, 20227706580006440400000
Sunday, January 1, 20237956460006941200000
Monday, January 1, 20249755260008593800000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly and Company and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain.

Eli Lilly's Consistency

Eli Lilly has maintained a steady SG&A expense, averaging around $6.4 billion annually from 2014 to 2023. This consistency reflects a robust operational strategy, allowing the company to focus on innovation and market expansion without significant fluctuations in administrative costs.

Alnylam's Growth Trajectory

Conversely, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals has seen a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, growing from approximately $45 million in 2014 to nearly $796 million in 2023. This 1,670% increase underscores Alnylam's aggressive growth strategy, likely driven by its expansion into new markets and investment in sales infrastructure.

These insights highlight the diverse approaches companies take in managing operational costs, offering valuable lessons for industry stakeholders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025