__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Nokia Oyj |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 1634000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 1651000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 3819000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 3615000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 3463000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 3101000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 2898000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 2792000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 3013000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 2929000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry giants like Applied Materials, Inc. and Nokia Oyj is crucial. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, these companies have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses, reflecting their strategic priorities and market challenges.
Applied Materials, Inc. has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 102% from 2014 to 2023. This upward trend suggests a robust investment in administrative capabilities and market expansion. In contrast, Nokia Oyj's SG&A expenses peaked in 2016, with a notable 134% increase from 2014, before stabilizing in recent years. This fluctuation highlights Nokia's strategic shifts and adaptation to market dynamics.
Interestingly, the data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. As these companies continue to navigate the competitive tech landscape, their financial strategies will undoubtedly evolve, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Nokia Oyj
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Nokia Oyj
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Nokia Oyj
Comparing Innovation Spending: Applied Materials, Inc. and Nokia Oyj
Applied Materials, Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ): SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Applied Materials, Inc. vs NetApp, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and PTC Inc.
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Nokia Oyj
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and ON Semiconductor Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Ubiquiti Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Applied Materials, Inc. or Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?