Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pharming Group N.V. vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Strategic Spending

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Pharming Group N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 201448238694042025
Thursday, January 1, 201567459685279557
Friday, January 1, 201684947428073913
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283544864073
Monday, January 1, 20182250292253488904
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075765896361
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081769968267
Friday, January 1, 20214289688992047281
Saturday, January 1, 202252458024131819000
Sunday, January 1, 20235902000087501000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Tale of Two Biotechs: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing costs is crucial for success. This chart compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Pharming Group N.V. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Pharming Group N.V. consistently outspent ADMA Biologics, Inc., with its SG&A expenses peaking at approximately 132% higher than ADMA's in 2022.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2016: Both companies maintained relatively low SG&A expenses, with ADMA Biologics, Inc. showing a steady increase of around 76% over these years.
  • 2017-2020: Pharming Group N.V. saw a significant rise, with expenses more than doubling, reflecting strategic investments or expansions.
  • 2021-2023: While ADMA Biologics, Inc. increased its expenses by 38%, Pharming Group N.V. experienced fluctuations, indicating possible shifts in business strategy.

Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's operational strategies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025