Sanofi or Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Sanofi vs. Blueprint: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampBlueprint Medicines CorporationSanofi
Wednesday, January 1, 201478900008565000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015144560009496000000
Friday, January 1, 2016192180009592000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172798600010164000000
Monday, January 1, 2018479280009934000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019963880009883000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201577430009390000000
Friday, January 1, 20211952930009555000000
Saturday, January 1, 202223737400010539000000
Sunday, January 1, 202329514100010765000000
Monday, January 1, 20243592720009183000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Managing SG&A Costs: Sanofi vs. Blueprint Medicines Corporation

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Sanofi and Blueprint Medicines Corporation have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Sanofi's SG&A expenses have consistently hovered around $10 billion annually, reflecting a stable yet substantial investment in administrative functions. In contrast, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, a smaller player, has seen its SG&A costs grow from approximately $8 million in 2014 to nearly $295 million in 2023, marking a staggering increase of over 3,600%. This growth highlights Blueprint's aggressive expansion strategy. While Sanofi's expenses represent a larger absolute figure, Blueprint's rapid increase in SG&A costs as a percentage of revenue could indicate a strategic focus on scaling operations. Understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into each company's operational priorities and financial strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025