Comparing SG&A Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: Pharma Giants vs. Biotech Innovators

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanySarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014569900000049315000
Thursday, January 1, 2015500100000075043000
Friday, January 1, 2016500200000083749000
Sunday, January 1, 20174849000000122682000
Monday, January 1, 20184551000000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194871000000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207661000000317875000
Friday, January 1, 20217690000000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 20227814000000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 20237772000000481871000
Monday, January 1, 20248414000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability and competitive edge. Over the past decade, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb's SG&A expenses have seen a significant increase, peaking in 2022 with a 37% rise from 2014. This growth reflects the company's strategic investments in marketing and administrative capabilities to support its expanding portfolio.

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Conversely, Sarepta Therapeutics, a smaller player, has experienced a staggering 878% increase in SG&A expenses over the same period. This surge underscores Sarepta's aggressive expansion and investment in its administrative infrastructure to support its innovative therapies.

These trends highlight the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical giants and emerging biotech firms in navigating the competitive landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025