Comparing SG&A Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Viking Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: BMS vs Viking - A Decade of Financial Strategy

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyViking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201456990000001244910
Thursday, January 1, 201550010000005029636
Friday, January 1, 201650020000004846776
Sunday, January 1, 201748490000005329003
Monday, January 1, 201845510000007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 201948710000009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020766100000010731000
Friday, January 1, 2021769000000010701000
Saturday, January 1, 2022781400000016121000
Sunday, January 1, 2023777200000037021000
Monday, January 1, 20248414000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of pharmaceuticals, the financial strategies of companies can be as varied as their drug portfolios. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS) and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating contrast in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, BMS's SG&A expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking in 2022 with a 72% rise from 2014. This reflects their aggressive market expansion and strategic acquisitions. In contrast, Viking Therapeutics, a smaller player, has seen a dramatic 2,870% increase in SG&A expenses, indicating their rapid growth and investment in market presence.

Insights and Implications

While BMS's expenses reflect a mature market strategy, Viking's surge suggests a company in the throes of expansion. Investors and analysts should consider these trends when evaluating the financial health and strategic direction of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025