Comparing SG&A Expenses: CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. vs Novavax, Inc. Trends and Insights

Biotech SG&A Expenses: CymaBay vs. Novavax

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.Novavax, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014818500019928000
Thursday, January 1, 2015887100030842000
Friday, January 1, 2016964500046527000
Sunday, January 1, 20171238700034451000
Monday, January 1, 20181438100034409000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191923800034417000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017425000145290000
Friday, January 1, 202123040000298358000
Saturday, January 1, 202225116000488691000
Sunday, January 1, 202351953000468946000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the ever-evolving biotech industry, understanding financial trends is crucial. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. and Novavax, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Novavax's SG&A expenses surged by over 2,250%, peaking in 2022 with a staggering 488 million dollars. In contrast, CymaBay's expenses grew by approximately 535%, reaching 52 million dollars in 2023. This stark difference highlights Novavax's aggressive expansion and operational scaling, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, which necessitated increased administrative costs. Meanwhile, CymaBay's steady growth reflects a more conservative approach, focusing on sustainable development. These insights underscore the diverse strategies within the biotech sector, offering valuable lessons for investors and industry stakeholders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025