Eli Lilly and Company and Novavax, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Eli Lilly vs. Novavax: A Decade of SG&A Spending Divergence

__timestampEli Lilly and CompanyNovavax, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014662080000019928000
Thursday, January 1, 2015653300000030842000
Friday, January 1, 2016645200000046527000
Sunday, January 1, 2017658810000034451000
Monday, January 1, 2018597510000034409000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019621380000034417000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206121200000145290000
Friday, January 1, 20216431600000298358000
Saturday, January 1, 20226440400000488691000
Sunday, January 1, 20236941200000468946000
Monday, January 1, 20248593800000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Spending Patterns: Eli Lilly vs. Novavax

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding spending patterns can offer valuable insights into a company's strategic priorities. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly and Company and Novavax, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.

A Decade of Divergence

From 2014 to 2023, Eli Lilly consistently allocated a significant portion of its budget to SG&A, with a steady increase of approximately 5% over the period. In contrast, Novavax's SG&A expenses surged by over 2,200%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies.

Strategic Implications

Eli Lilly's stable SG&A spending suggests a focus on maintaining market presence and operational efficiency. Meanwhile, Novavax's dramatic increase indicates a strategic pivot towards growth and innovation, likely driven by its recent vaccine developments. This divergence highlights the varied paths companies take to achieve success in the competitive pharmaceutical landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025