Comparing SG&A Expenses: Grifols, S.A. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: Grifols vs. Dynavax - A Decade of Change

__timestampDynavax Technologies CorporationGrifols, S.A.
Wednesday, January 1, 201417763000660772000
Thursday, January 1, 201522180000736435000
Friday, January 1, 201637257000775266000
Sunday, January 1, 201727367000860348000
Monday, January 1, 201864770000814775000
Tuesday, January 1, 201974986000942821000
Wednesday, January 1, 202079256000985616000
Friday, January 1, 20211001560001061508000
Saturday, January 1, 20221314080001190423000
Sunday, January 1, 20231529460001254234000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial strategies of key players is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Grifols, S.A. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation from 2014 to 2023.

Grifols, S.A.: A Steady Climb

Grifols, S.A. has consistently maintained a robust SG&A expense profile, with a notable increase of approximately 90% over the decade. This steady growth reflects their strategic investments in global expansion and innovation.

Dynavax Technologies: Rapid Growth

In contrast, Dynavax Technologies Corporation has experienced a dramatic rise in SG&A expenses, surging by over 750% during the same period. This sharp increase underscores their aggressive market penetration and product development efforts.

Insights

While Grifols' expenses indicate a stable growth trajectory, Dynavax's rapid escalation suggests a dynamic approach to capturing market share. These trends offer valuable insights into the strategic priorities of these pharmaceutical giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025