Comparing SG&A Expenses: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Trends and Insights

Biotech Giants: SG&A Expense Trends Over a Decade

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014746100049315000
Thursday, January 1, 20151304700075043000
Friday, January 1, 20161125300083749000
Sunday, January 1, 201713933000122682000
Monday, January 1, 201829514000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 201937121000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 202067929000317875000
Friday, January 1, 2021118818000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 2022159371000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 2023213894000481871000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing expenses is crucial for success. Over the past decade, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.

A Decade of Growth

From 2014 to 2023, Sarepta Therapeutics saw a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing by nearly 900%. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals experienced a more moderate rise of approximately 280%, indicating a more conservative approach.

Strategic Insights

By 2023, Sarepta's SG&A expenses were more than double those of BioCryst, highlighting their larger scale of operations. This divergence in spending strategies offers insights into each company's growth trajectory and market positioning. Investors and industry analysts can glean valuable insights from these trends, as they reflect broader strategic priorities and market dynamics.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025