Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Expenses: Alnylam vs. BioCryst

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014445260007461000
Thursday, January 1, 20156061000013047000
Friday, January 1, 20168935400011253000
Sunday, January 1, 201719936500013933000
Monday, January 1, 201838235900029514000
Tuesday, January 1, 201947900500037121000
Wednesday, January 1, 202058842000067929000
Friday, January 1, 2021620639000118818000
Saturday, January 1, 2022770658000159371000
Sunday, January 1, 2023795646000213894000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Navigating SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing costs is crucial for success. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Alnylam's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,600%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, BioCryst's expenses grew by approximately 2,800%, albeit from a smaller base, indicating a rapid scaling of operations.

By 2023, Alnylam's SG&A expenses reached nearly $796 million, while BioCryst's expenses were approximately $214 million. This disparity highlights Alnylam's larger operational scale and market presence. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how these companies allocate resources to support growth and innovation. As the biotech landscape evolves, monitoring such financial metrics will be key to predicting future industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025