Comparing SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc. Trends and Insights

Diverging SG&A Trends: Comfort Systems vs. Thomson Reuters

__timestampComfort Systems USA, Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20142076520009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152289650008810000000
Friday, January 1, 20162432010008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172665860008079000000
Monday, January 1, 20182969860004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193400050004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203577770003999000000
Friday, January 1, 20213763090001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 20224893440001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 202353618899964000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of a company's operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A expenses.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc.

From 2014 to 2023, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 158%. This upward trend reflects the company's expansion and investment in administrative capabilities.

Thomson Reuters Corporation

Conversely, Thomson Reuters Corporation experienced a dramatic decline of about 99% in SG&A expenses over the same period. This significant reduction could indicate strategic cost-cutting measures or a shift in business focus.

Insights

These trends highlight the diverse strategies companies employ to manage operational costs, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025