__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5229000000 | 129917000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5707000000 | 152898000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6314000000 | 177792000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 8005000000 | 212646000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9436000000 | 259714000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8222000000 | 281596000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9510000000 | 378498000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12149000000 | 522339000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13792000000 | 745596000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14133000000 | 799953000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14279000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of semiconductor manufacturing, Applied Materials, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. stand as titans of innovation. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, these companies have showcased remarkable growth in their cost of revenue, a key indicator of operational scale and efficiency.
Applied Materials has seen its cost of revenue surge by approximately 172%, reflecting its expanding market presence and technological advancements. In contrast, Monolithic Power Systems, while smaller in scale, has experienced a staggering 516% increase, underscoring its rapid growth trajectory in the power solutions sector.
Interestingly, the data for 2024 is incomplete, hinting at potential shifts in the industry dynamics. As these companies continue to innovate, their financial strategies will be pivotal in shaping the future of semiconductor technology.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Electronic Arts Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and II-VI Incorporated
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Microchip Technology Incorporated
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and ANSYS, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and GoDaddy Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fortive Corporation
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.