__timestamp | Ferrovial SE | Pool Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1131000000 | 1603222000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1143000000 | 1687495000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1267000000 | 1829716000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1345000000 | 1982899000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 985000000 | 2127924000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 949000000 | 2274592000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1005000000 | 2805721000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1077000000 | 3678492000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1197000000 | 4246315000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1129000000 | 3881551000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding cost structures is crucial. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Ferrovial SE and Pool Corporation from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Pool Corporation's cost of revenue surged by approximately 142%, peaking in 2022, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Ferrovial SE experienced a more modest 6% increase, with fluctuations indicating strategic shifts in operations.
These insights provide a window into the financial strategies of these companies, offering valuable lessons for investors and industry analysts alike.
Ferrovial SE vs CNH Industrial N.V.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Ferrovial SE vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Who Generates More Revenue? Ferrovial SE or Pool Corporation
Ferrovial SE vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Ferrovial SE vs AECOM: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Ferrovial SE and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s Expenses
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Pool Corporation