__timestamp | ASML Holding N.V. | Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 318672000 | 66755000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 345700000 | 72312000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 374800000 | 83012000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 416600000 | 97257000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 488000000 | 113803000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 520500000 | 133542000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 544900000 | 161670000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 725600000 | 226190000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 909600000 | 273595000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1113200000 | 275740000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1165700000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, effective cost management is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry giants: ASML Holding N.V. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.
ASML, a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 250% over the past decade. This increase reflects its strategic investments in expanding its global footprint and enhancing its technological capabilities.
Meanwhile, Monolithic Power Systems, a pioneer in power solutions, has experienced a more modest rise of around 310% in SG&A expenses. This growth underscores its commitment to innovation and market expansion.
Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into how these companies balance operational costs with strategic growth, providing a roadmap for other tech firms aiming for sustainable success.
ASML Holding N.V. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost Insights: Breaking Down ASML Holding N.V. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.'s Expenses
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? ASML Holding N.V. or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Research and Development Investment: ASML Holding N.V. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of ASML Holding N.V. and Corpay, Inc.
ASML Holding N.V. or ANSYS, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: ASML Holding N.V. vs Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ASML Holding N.V. or Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
ASML Holding N.V. vs Fortive Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of ASML Holding N.V. and Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ASML Holding N.V. or GoDaddy Inc.
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: ASML Holding N.V. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.