Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ASML Holding N.V. or Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

ASML vs. Broadridge: SG&A Cost Optimization Showdown

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014318672000376000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015345700000396800000
Friday, January 1, 2016374800000420900000
Sunday, January 1, 2017416600000501400000
Monday, January 1, 2018488000000565400000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019520500000577500000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020544900000639000000
Friday, January 1, 2021725600000744300000
Saturday, January 1, 2022909600000832300000
Sunday, January 1, 20231113200000849000000
Monday, January 1, 20241165700000916800000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. ASML Holding N.V. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. have been at the forefront of this financial discipline since 2014. Over the past decade, Broadridge has consistently optimized its SG&A costs, maintaining a steady increase of approximately 5% annually. In contrast, ASML's SG&A expenses surged by nearly 250% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

While Broadridge's expenses peaked at 916 million in 2024, ASML's expenses reached 1.11 billion in 2023, indicating a more volatile approach. This data highlights the strategic differences between the two companies: Broadridge's steady, controlled growth versus ASML's rapid expansion. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into their financial strategies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025