__timestamp | ASML Holding N.V. | GoDaddy Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 318672000 | 333054000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 345700000 | 421900000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 374800000 | 450000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 416600000 | 535600000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 488000000 | 625400000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 520500000 | 707700000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 544900000 | 762300000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 725600000 | 849700000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 909600000 | 797800000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1113200000 | 1019300000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1165700000 | 751100000 |
Unleashing insights
In the competitive landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. ASML Holding N.V. and GoDaddy Inc. have been at the forefront of this financial balancing act since 2014. Over the past decade, ASML has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 250%, while GoDaddy's expenses have increased by around 200%. Despite this growth, ASML's strategic cost management has allowed it to maintain a more consistent expense-to-revenue ratio, particularly evident in 2022 when their SG&A expenses were 14% lower than GoDaddy's. This trend highlights ASML's efficiency in optimizing operational costs, a critical factor in sustaining its competitive edge in the semiconductor industry. As businesses navigate the complexities of financial management, the strategies employed by these two companies offer valuable insights into effective cost optimization.
Who Generates More Revenue? ASML Holding N.V. or GoDaddy Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: ASML Holding N.V. and GoDaddy Inc.
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing ASML Holding N.V. and GoDaddy Inc.
ASML Holding N.V. or ANSYS, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: ASML Holding N.V. vs Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Comparing Innovation Spending: ASML Holding N.V. and GoDaddy Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for ASML Holding N.V. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ASML Holding N.V. or Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
ASML Holding N.V. vs Fortive Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of ASML Holding N.V. and Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for ASML Holding N.V. and Splunk Inc.
ASML Holding N.V. or Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ): Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?