__timestamp | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2983000000 | 612613000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 3426000000 | 650773000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 3398000000 | 619061000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 3878000000 | 628106000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 4056000000 | 717599000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 4381000000 | 964737000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 5151000000 | 875663000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 5246000000 | 886361000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 5673000000 | 997309000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 6090000000 | 1053819000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 6091000000 | 1053819000000 |
Cracking the code
In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, effective cost management is crucial. Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, two industry giants, have demonstrated contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade.
From 2014 to 2023, Gilead Sciences saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising by approximately 104% from 2014 to 2023. This upward trend reflects strategic investments in marketing and administrative capabilities, crucial for maintaining their market position.
Takeda, on the other hand, exhibited a more dramatic increase, with SG&A expenses growing by around 72% over the same period. This surge, particularly notable in 2019, underscores Takeda's aggressive expansion and integration strategies.
While Gilead's expenses show a consistent growth pattern, Takeda's fluctuations suggest a more dynamic approach to cost management. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and market positioning.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sanofi or Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Opthea Limited
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Gilead Sciences, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Catalent, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited vs Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited vs Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated Trends and Insights