Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Gilead Sciences, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: A Decade in Review

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.ImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201429830000004326000
Thursday, January 1, 20153426000000226206000
Friday, January 1, 2016339800000094391000
Sunday, January 1, 2017387800000053821000
Monday, January 1, 2018405600000035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019438100000046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020515100000071318000
Friday, January 1, 20215246000000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 20225673000000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 20236090000000129620000
Monday, January 1, 20246091000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Navigating SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, effective cost management is crucial. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Gilead Sciences, a leader in antiviral drugs, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 104% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its expansive market reach and robust operational scale. In contrast, ImmunityBio, a smaller player focused on immunotherapy, has experienced a more volatile trajectory, with expenses peaking in 2015 and fluctuating thereafter. By 2023, ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses were about 2% of Gilead's, highlighting the stark difference in scale and operational strategy. This comparison underscores the diverse approaches within the biotech sector, where size and focus significantly influence financial strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025