__timestamp | Oracle Corporation | Seagate Technology Holdings plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 8605000000 | 722000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 8732000000 | 857000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 9039000000 | 635000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 9299000000 | 606000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9715000000 | 562000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 9774000000 | 453000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9275000000 | 473000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 8936000000 | 502000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 9364000000 | 559000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 10412000000 | 491000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 9822000000 | 460000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology giants, effective cost management is crucial. Over the past decade, Oracle Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc have demonstrated contrasting strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Oracle's SG&A expenses have shown a steady upward trend, peaking in 2023 with a 21% increase from 2014. This reflects Oracle's strategic investments in marketing and administrative capabilities to maintain its competitive edge.
Conversely, Seagate's SG&A expenses have decreased by approximately 36% over the same period, indicating a focus on cost efficiency and streamlined operations. This reduction aligns with Seagate's strategic pivot towards optimizing its core business functions. The data highlights the diverse approaches these companies take in navigating financial management, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities and market positioning.
Revenue Insights: Oracle Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc Performance Compared
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Oracle Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Oracle Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
R&D Spending Showdown: Oracle Corporation vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Oracle Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Oracle Corporation or ON Semiconductor Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Oracle Corporation vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Oracle Corporation and VeriSign, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Oracle Corporation vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Oracle Corporation vs Zebra Technologies Corporation
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Oracle Corporation or Pure Storage, Inc.
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Oracle Corporation vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc