__timestamp | ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | Oracle Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 13673000000 | 8605000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14295000000 | 8732000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 15099000000 | 9039000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15767000000 | 9299000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 19552000000 | 9715000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 22389000000 | 9774000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 23806000000 | 9275000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 27191000000 | 8936000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 30384000000 | 9364000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 25930017000 | 10412000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 27353513000 | 9822000000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of global technology, the financial strategies of industry leaders like Oracle Corporation and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. offer a fascinating glimpse into their operational priorities. Over the past decade, Oracle's Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking in 2023 with a 21% rise from 2014. Meanwhile, ASE Technology's SG&A costs have surged by an impressive 89% over the same period, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies.
Oracle's consistent expenditure suggests a focus on maintaining its established market position, while ASE Technology's fluctuating costs highlight its dynamic approach to growth. Notably, 2024 data for ASE Technology is missing, indicating potential shifts in financial reporting or strategic pivots. This comparison underscores the diverse paths these tech titans take in navigating the competitive global market.
Oracle Corporation vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Oracle Corporation and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Oracle Corporation vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Oracle Corporation vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Oracle Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Oracle Corporation or ON Semiconductor Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Oracle Corporation vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Oracle Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Oracle Corporation and VeriSign, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Oracle Corporation vs Zebra Technologies Corporation
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Oracle Corporation or Pure Storage, Inc.
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Oracle Corporation Against ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.