__timestamp | Ferrovial SE | ITT Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1131000000 | 1788200000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1143000000 | 1676500000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1267000000 | 1647200000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1345000000 | 1768100000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 985000000 | 1857900000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 949000000 | 1936300000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1005000000 | 1695600000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1077000000 | 1865500000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1197000000 | 2065400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1129000000 | 2175700000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2383400000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, Ferrovial SE and ITT Inc. stand as titans in their respective industries. Over the past decade, these companies have showcased intriguing trends in their cost of revenue, a critical metric that reflects the direct costs attributable to the production of goods sold by a company.
From 2014 to 2023, Ferrovial SE's cost of revenue has seen a modest increase of approximately 8%, peaking in 2017. Despite a dip in 2018, the company has maintained a stable trajectory, reflecting its strategic cost management in the face of global economic challenges.
Conversely, ITT Inc. has experienced a more pronounced growth of around 22% in the same period. This surge, particularly notable in the last two years, underscores ITT's aggressive expansion and investment in operational efficiencies.
These insights not only highlight the financial strategies of these corporations but also offer a window into the broader economic trends influencing their industries.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Ferrovial SE and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s Expenses
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Clean Harbors, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs TFI International Inc.
Ferrovial SE vs American Airlines Group Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Ferrovial SE and ITT Inc.
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Ferrovial SE vs ITT Inc.