Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Owens Corning

Ferrovial vs Owens Corning: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampFerrovial SEOwens Corning
Wednesday, January 1, 201411310000004300000000
Thursday, January 1, 201511430000004197000000
Friday, January 1, 201612670000004296000000
Sunday, January 1, 201713450000004812000000
Monday, January 1, 20189850000005425000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199490000005551000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010050000005445000000
Friday, January 1, 202110770000006281000000
Saturday, January 1, 202211970000007145000000
Sunday, January 1, 202311290000006994000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the world of global business, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's efficiency and profitability. This comparison between Ferrovial SE and Owens Corning offers a fascinating glimpse into their financial journeys from 2014 to 2023.

Ferrovial SE: A Steady Climb

Ferrovial SE, a leader in infrastructure and mobility, has shown a consistent cost of revenue, averaging around €1.1 billion annually. Despite a dip in 2018, the company rebounded, peaking in 2017 with a 19% increase from 2014.

Owens Corning: A Robust Growth

Owens Corning, a powerhouse in building materials, has experienced a more dynamic trajectory. Starting at $4.3 billion in 2014, their cost of revenue surged by 66% to $7.1 billion in 2022, reflecting their aggressive expansion and market adaptation.
This comparison highlights the diverse strategies and market conditions influencing these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025