Cost of Revenue Comparison: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotech Giants: Gilead vs. ACADIA Cost of Revenue

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014606020003788000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015763690004006000000
Friday, January 1, 201644060004261000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017130600004371000000
Monday, January 1, 2018183300004853000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019195980004675000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020205500004572000000
Friday, January 1, 2021191410006601000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022101660005657000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023457310006498000000
Monday, January 1, 202428675800000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for assessing a company's financial health. This chart offers a fascinating comparison between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023.

Gilead Sciences, a titan in the industry, consistently reported a cost of revenue that dwarfs that of ACADIA, with figures peaking at approximately $6.6 billion in 2021. This represents a staggering 1,300% increase compared to ACADIA's highest cost of revenue in 2015. Meanwhile, ACADIA's cost of revenue fluctuated, reaching its zenith in 2015 and experiencing a notable dip in 2016.

This data underscores the scale at which Gilead operates, reflecting its expansive product portfolio and market reach. In contrast, ACADIA's more modest figures highlight its focused approach in the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025