Cost of Revenue Comparison: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Mesoblast Limited

Biotech Giants: Gilead vs. Mesoblast Revenue Costs

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Mesoblast Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014378800000025434000
Thursday, January 1, 2015400600000023783000
Friday, January 1, 2016426100000029763000
Sunday, January 1, 2017437100000012065000
Monday, January 1, 201848530000005508000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019467500000075173000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020457200000081497000
Friday, January 1, 2021660100000085731000
Saturday, January 1, 2022565700000063572000
Sunday, January 1, 2023649800000054922000
Monday, January 1, 20242867580000041070000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Mesoblast Limited stand as intriguing case studies. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead Sciences consistently reported a cost of revenue that dwarfed Mesoblast's, with figures peaking at approximately $6.6 billion in 2021. This represents a staggering 1,200% increase compared to Mesoblast's highest cost of revenue, which reached around $85.7 million the same year.

Gilead's cost of revenue saw a notable rise of about 72% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its expansive operations and market reach. In contrast, Mesoblast's cost of revenue fluctuated, peaking in 2021 before declining. The data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the dynamic nature of financial reporting. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies and market positions of these two biotech firms, offering valuable insights into their operational scales and financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025