__timestamp | Graco Inc. | Pentair plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 554394000 | 4563000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 601785000 | 4263200000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 621054000 | 3095900000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 681695000 | 3107400000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 770753000 | 1917400000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 786289000 | 1905700000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 795178000 | 1960200000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 953659000 | 2445600000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1086082000 | 2757200000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1034585000 | 2585300000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 990855000 | 2484000000 |
Cracking the code
In the competitive landscape of industrial manufacturing, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. This analysis compares the cost of revenue for Pentair plc and Graco Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Pentair plc, a leader in water solutions, consistently reported higher costs, peaking in 2014 with a staggering 4.56 billion. However, by 2023, their costs had decreased by 43% to 2.59 billion, reflecting strategic cost management. In contrast, Graco Inc., specializing in fluid handling systems, showed a steady increase in costs, rising by 86% from 2014 to 2023, reaching 1.03 billion. This trend highlights Graco's expansion and investment in innovation. Notably, data for Pentair in 2024 is missing, indicating potential reporting delays. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies of these industrial giants in managing their cost structures over the past decade.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Pentair plc and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Pentair plc and AECOM
Pentair plc vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Pentair plc vs Graco Inc.: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pentair plc or Graco Inc.