__timestamp | AECOM | Pentair plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 4452451000 | 4563000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 17454692000 | 4263200000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 16768001000 | 3095900000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 17519682000 | 3107400000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 19504863000 | 1917400000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 19359884000 | 1905700000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 12530416000 | 1960200000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12542431000 | 2445600000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 12300208000 | 2757200000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 13432996000 | 2585300000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 15021157000 | 2484000000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial giants, understanding cost structures is pivotal. Pentair plc and AECOM, two stalwarts in their respective fields, offer intriguing insights into cost management over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, AECOM's cost of revenue has shown a dynamic range, peaking in 2018 with a 33% increase from its 2014 figures. Meanwhile, Pentair plc's cost of revenue has been more stable, with a notable dip in 2018, marking a 58% decrease from the previous year. This fluctuation highlights the strategic shifts and market conditions impacting these companies. Interestingly, 2023 data reveals a resurgence for AECOM, with a 9% increase from 2022, while Pentair plc's figures remain consistent. Missing data for 2024 suggests potential strategic pivots or reporting delays, inviting further analysis.
Pentair plc and AECOM: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Pentair plc and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Pentair plc vs Graco Inc.
Pentair plc vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Pentair plc vs AECOM
Pentair plc or AECOM: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?