Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Johnson & Johnson and HUTCHMED (China) Limited

Comparative cost insights: J&J vs. HUTCHMED (2014-2023)

__timestampHUTCHMED (China) LimitedJohnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 20147204900022746000000
Thursday, January 1, 201511077700021536000000
Friday, January 1, 201615632800021685000000
Sunday, January 1, 201717582000025354000000
Monday, January 1, 201814394400027091000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201916015200027556000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202018851900028427000000
Friday, January 1, 202125823400023402000000
Saturday, January 1, 202231110300024596000000
Sunday, January 1, 202338444700026553000000
Monday, January 1, 202427471000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Cost of Revenue: A Comparative Analysis

In the ever-evolving landscape of global healthcare and pharmaceuticals, understanding the cost dynamics of industry giants like Johnson & Johnson and emerging players such as HUTCHMED (China) Limited is crucial. Over the past decade, Johnson & Johnson has consistently maintained a high cost of revenue, averaging around $25 billion annually. This figure underscores its expansive operations and market dominance. In contrast, HUTCHMED, a rising star in the Chinese pharmaceutical sector, has shown a remarkable growth trajectory. From 2014 to 2023, its cost of revenue surged by over 400%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and increasing market footprint.

This data not only highlights the scale of operations but also offers insights into strategic priorities. While Johnson & Johnson's stable costs suggest a focus on efficiency and innovation, HUTCHMED's rising costs indicate investment in growth and market penetration. As the healthcare industry continues to globalize, these trends offer a glimpse into the future strategies of these key players.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025